Latest


The “28t” Incident


Post contents


Introduction

On the monday morning of the 1st of december a comment was made under the username “WE2” under the post LeysLeks Counter Strike. The comment include one word with an attachment. The comment was posted at 11:12am CET. The text massage of the comment was eight letters long, the massage was “mamacita”. But to know why “mamacita” is of relevance we to look at the attachment.

Original image of comment, with bredweb pre-alpha ui. Date is on the 1st of december 2025, time unknown.

The attachment “28t” was quickly changed by moderation. The time that the original attachment was accessable for is uncertain, but we know it was changed within two hours.

Images showing the replacement image set by moderation soon after the comment was made.

Who posted the comment?

The comment was posted from a HP ProBook 440 G9, the location has never been revealed of where it was posted from. But who is the person behinde the comment? According to eye witnesses it was indeed posted from the user WE2’s computer. But the compter was allegedly in the hands of another induvidual named E*(name has be redacted for privacy). E* hade full unsupervised access for mintues before the computer was retrived. Even though E*’s name was never released it is belived E* is also the owner of the domain fugel.se. It is also belived that E* is behinde the spam comment incident that happend before the “28t” incident on the 1st of december. For context the spam incident was a spam of comments promting fugel.se, some of the comments are still visable under the first two posts made by the owner of bredweb nick. Some sorces state that E* is behinde the comments under the post LeysLeks Counter Strike, he is using a guest user named “bättre än båda er” which is swedish and translates to “better than both of you” the context shows that the name is about being better than the guest user “WE2” and another guest user named “Leys”. In the coversation the guest user “WE2” guess under another name “WE2 cooler than leysleks”, looking at the context the user “WE2” and “Leys” already had a fued between on another. Why the user “bättre än båda er” is named that is unclear. The user did not have a website linked. But “WE2” and “Leys” both had fugel.se linked as their website, why that is the case is unclear.

What was the comment about?

The “28t” comments context is of up most imporetance. The context is that all of the comments are already talking about topics such as gooning and hinting at hentai, with the user dropping two picture of anime girls wearing minimal attire. One user who was online on bredweb at the time of the incident said that the conversation was “getting freaky”. Acordding to some sources these comments were indeed posed by E*, it is unclear if moderation has confirmed this or not.

28t

“28t.webp” is the original attachment uploaded with the comment. The “.webp” image contains a page of a adult-oriented manga. The text in the comment says “mamacita” and is of referance to the anime girl in the image. The image orignitanes from the site nhentai.net, which is a site that host adult-oriented content. This has been confirmed by eye witness and it should be traceable to the site. But it has not been tested.

Image The original images(cencord). Found by an anonymous user.

Conclusion

All evidence is pointing that the culprit tried to pin the comment on the user “WE2”. But the moderation team has never confirmed if any of the other comments were made by E*. It is also unclear if E* is the owner of the domain fugel.se. But the evidence is pointing to that all of it is done by one person with a certain thing for anime artworks and erotic anime artworks. There by the most likely suspect is E*.

As of the 3rd of december a user named “fugel” has appeared on bredweb, at the moment it is unclear if this is E*’s account but most likely it belongs to E*. The user “fugel” has not made a comment on the allegations.(outdated)

LATEST UPDATES

3rd of december

The user fugel has responed to the allegations, see linked post. Fugel’s response the user also made a follow up post regarding their profile picture, see post here. // 3rd of december 08:59pm.

4th of december

Multiple posts was made by the user fugel about the situation. The established reviewer and reporter Alex_Log made a post about the situation. WE2 has not responed to the allegations.

Final edit:

*This situation was resolved between both parties behinde closed doors.

Other images:

Images showing the “28t” incident comment, in the lastest comments feed.(taken on 1st of december 2025, time ??:??)

if more images sufaces those will be added here.

*The uncencord 28t.webp images does exist still in .png format, somewhere but unclear where.


2 responses to “The “28t” Incident”


Leave a Reply