In a certain post on the Bredweb forum, it is described that a user “E*” has committed heinous acts such as posting adult content under others’ names and spreading material that hints at adult manga called hentai. The post also suggests that the user called “fugel” (me) is the same person as the described user “E*”. There are also doubts raised about the ownership of the domain fugel.se.

I am writing this post today to deny any false accusations and to clear my name. This post will cover the three main topics in the following order:

1. 28t.webp inncident
2. “E*’s” connection to fugel and the previously mentioned adult manga
3. ownership of fugel.se
   

28t.webp inncident

This post was, as stated, posted from the computer of the user we2, also known as wernertheman2. However, there is no further evidence identifying the poster other than a single witness. The origin of this witness cannot be established, and therefore their testimony cannot be considered reliable evidence. Even if the witness were brought forward and verified, there is no legitimate way to confirm the truth of their statements. There is no concrete evidence linking the user “E*” to this incident.

Therefore, the principle of innocent until proven guilty applies, and the user we2 should be held accountable for the heinous acts of the 28th incident.

---

“E*” Connection to Fugel and the Previously Mentioned Adult Manga

I can personally confirm that the user “E*” and Fugel are the same person — that is, myself. I can also confirm with some certainty that the user “bättre än båda er” has no connection to Fugel.

Regarding the previously mentioned hentai content: I enjoy this kind of material privately. However, I would never post it publicly. It is a personal secret that I will not share with anyone who does not already know.

I have also examined the image involved in the 28th incident. I can confirm that it originates from nhentai.net, a site I frequently visit. The content belongs to a popular series that often appears on the site’s front page. It is clear that the culprit of the 28th incident likely took a random image from the front page to frame me, knowing that I would be the most likely target due to my personal interests. This constitutes a deliberate false accusation and further supports my claim that the user we2 is responsible for the incident.

---

Ownership of Fugel.se

The post also casts doubt on the ownership of fugel.se, claiming that multiple users have listed it as their own. I can confirm that it is indeed my site. I am happy to provide proof of ownership to anyone who questions it.

---

That is all. For further questions, please contact my lawyer, Noiccen.